Are tanks obsolete after the development of anti-tank weapons?
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
No. A new technology doesn’t change the tactics all that much. Matchlocks were introduced to Japan in 1543.
In about 50 years, Japan used matchlocks extensively. But matchlocks were new to Koreans. So in 1592 Japan invaded Korea with over 150,000 men, against 80,000 Korean soldiers. Did Samurais not use obsolete swords? No, they still used Katanas plenty of times.
Did Japan win with matchlocks? No. One clever Korean admiral invented an ancient ironclad called turtle ship (obviously).
Cutting off the sea lane from Japan made things difficult for the Japanese Army in Korea. Plus, the Ming dynasty sent 40,000 soldiers from the north to increase the odds (still 150,000 Japanese against 120,000). It wasn’t several ironclads that he had under his command. It was the tactics that won many naval engagements.
Ironclads did not prevent other obsolete ships from sailing. They still used other ships for hundreds of years after that.
Open top made it easier to use bows.
A British commando, Jack Churchill, used a longbow to down a German during WWII, because it was quiet. He also carried a sword (far right below).
Fast forwarding to the 21st century, with all the technological advancements, do we not use sharp pointy things? (It’s no longer a mandatory training since 2010, but that does not mean nobody is trained to use a bayonet.)
A new technology like Javelin gives a lot of power to one soldier.
Just like Panzerfaust had during WWII. Germany made over 8 million of these. That did not change warfare as much as we think it would have. If enemy infantry stops these guys, they cannot use them.

Armored vehicles must be protected by the infantry. A bunker or a hard point that infantry cannot clear, armored vehicles would eliminate, same as 1944. Infantry and armor having to work together hasn’t changed.
It was the poor Russian tactics in Ukraine that made it AT missiles stand out. All these areas should have been cleared out by the infantry before armored vehicles roll in. If they did that, we probably don’t think so highly of Javelins (as effective as they are).
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment